These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Greater efficacy of aldosterone blockade and diuretic reinforcement vs. dual renin-angiotensin blockade for left ventricular mass regression in patients with resistant hypertension.
    Author: Azizi M, Perdrix L, Bobrie G, Frank M, Chatellier G, Ménard J, Plouin PF.
    Journal: J Hypertens; 2014 Oct; 32(10):2038-44; discussion 2044. PubMed ID: 24983187.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: We report the results of an echocardiographic substudy carried out in a trial comparing the effects of two different treatment strategies - mineralocorticoid receptor blockade (MRB) and dual renin-angiotensin system blockade (RASB) - in patients with resistant hypertension. Both strategies reduce left ventricular mass index (LVMI), but they have not been compared in patients with resistant hypertension. METHODS: After 4-week treatment with 300 mg irbesartan + 12.5 mg hydrochorothiazide + 5 mg amlodipine, 86 patients with resistant hypertension were randomized to the add-on 25 mg spironolactone (MRB group, n = 46) or 5 mg ramipril (RASB group, n = 40) groups for 12 weeks. Treatment intensity was increased at week 4, 8 or 10 if home blood pressure (BP) was equal to or above 135/85 mmHg, by sequentially adding 20-40 mg furosemide and 5 mg amiloride (MRB group), or 10 mg ramipril and 5-10 mg bisoprolol (RASB group). Transthoracic echography was performed at baseline and week 12. RESULTS: Daytime ambulatory BP decreased by 19 ± 12/11 ± 8 mmHg in the MRB group and by 8 ± 13/7 ± 7 mmHg in the RASB group (P = 0.0003/0.03). LVMI decreased by 8.2 ± 18.9 g/m in the MRB group, whereas it increased by 1.8 ± 19.1 g/m in the RASB group (P = 0.03). The decreases in posterior wall thickness, left ventricular (LV) end-systolic diameter, E/e' ratio and left atrial area were significantly greater with MRB than with RASB. The difference between groups remained significant after adjustment for the decrease in ambulatory BP. CONCLUSION: In patients with resistant hypertension, MRB-based treatment decreased both BP and LVMI more efficiently than a strategy based on dual RASB.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]