These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prevalence of type 1 Brugada ECG pattern after administration of Class 1C drugs in patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy: Myotonic dystrophy as a part of the Brugada syndrome.
    Author: Maury P, Audoubert M, Cintas P, Rollin A, Duparc A, Mondoly P, Chiriac AM, Acket B, Zhao X, Pasquié JL, Cardin C, Delay M, Sadron M, Carrié D, Galinier M, Davy JM, Arne-Bès MC, Raczka F.
    Journal: Heart Rhythm; 2014 Oct; 11(10):1721-7. PubMed ID: 25016148.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Both type 1 myotonic dystrophy (MD1) and Brugada syndrome (BrS) may be complicated by conduction disturbances and sudden death. Spontaneous BrS has been observed in MD1 patients, but the prevalence of drug-induced BrS in MD1 is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the prevalence of type 1 ST elevation as elicited during pharmacologic challenge with Class 1C drugs in a subgroup of MD1 patients and to further establish correlations with ECG and electrophysiologic variables and prognosis. METHODS: From a group of unselected 270 MD1 patients, ajmaline or flecainide drug challenge was performed in a subgroup of 44 patients (27 men, median age 43 years) with minor depolarization/repolarization abnormalities suggestive of possible BrS. The presence of type 1 ST elevation after drug challenge was correlated to clinical, ECG, and electrophysiologic variables. RESULTS: Eight of 44 patients (18%) presented with BrS after drug challenge. BrS was seen more often in men (26% vs 6%, P = .09) and was related to younger age (35 vs 48 years, P = .07). BrS was not correlated to symptoms, baseline ECG, HV interval, results of signal-averaged ECG, or abnormalities on ambulatory recordings. MD1 patients with BrS had longer corrected QT intervals, greater increase in PR interval after drug challenge, and higher rate of inducible ventricular arrhythmias (62% vs 21%, P = .03). Twelve patients were implanted with a pacemaker and 5 with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Significant bradycardia did not occur in any patients, and malignant ventricular arrhythmia never occurred during median 7-year follow-up (except 1 hypokalemia-related ventricular fibrillation). CONCLUSION: BrS is elicited by a Class 1 drug in 18% of MD1 patients presenting with minor depolarization/repolarization abnormalities at baseline, but the finding seems to be devoid of a prognostic role.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]