These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Safety, feasibility, and effect of remote ischemic conditioning in patients undergoing lung transplantation.
    Author: Lin E, Snell GI, Levvey BJ, Mifsud N, Paul M, Buckland MR, Gooi J, Marasco S, Sharland AF, Myles PS.
    Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1139-48. PubMed ID: 25016922.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a significant problem after lung transplantation. Data from animal and clinical studies suggest that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) may reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury in solid organ transplantation. METHODS: A pilot randomized controlled trial of 60 patients undergoing bilateral sequential lung transplantation assessed the utility of RIC in attenuating PGD. Treated recipients underwent 3 cycles of lower limb ischemic conditioning before allograft reperfusion. The primary outcome measure was a comparison of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (P/F ratio) between treatment groups. RESULTS: No adverse effects of tourniquet application were observed. The mean lowest P/F ratio during the first 24 hours after transplantation was 271.3 mm Hg in the treatment arm vs 256.1 mm Hg in the control arm (p = 0.46). PGD grade and severity and the rate of acute rejection also showed a tendency to favor the treatment arm. Sub-group analysis demonstrated a significant benefit of treatment in patients with a primary diagnosis of restrictive lung disease, a group at high risk for the development of PGD. RIC was not accompanied by systemic release of high-molecular-weight group box 1. Levels of cytokines, high-molecular-weight group box 1, and endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products peaked within 2 hours after reperfusion and likely reflected donor organ quality rather than an effect of RIC. CONCLUSIONS: RIC did not significantly improve P/F ratios or PGD in this randomized controlled trial. However, encouraging results in this small study warrant a large multicenter trial of RIC in lung transplantation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]