These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Renal function-adjusted contrast volume redefines the baseline estimation of contrast-induced acute kidney injury risk in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Author: Andò G, de Gregorio C, Morabito G, Trio O, Saporito F, Oreto G.
    Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25027519.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Age, estimated glomerular renal function (eGFR), and ejection fraction are preprocedural predictors of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The effect of renal function-adjusted contrast volume (CV) remains not totally explored, and a threshold has not yet been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: Logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were used to assess whether CV/eGFR was an independent predictor of CI-AKI. The increased discriminative value of CV/eGFR over the preprocedural model based on age, eGFR, and ejection fraction was examined using the net reclassification improvement analysis. Of 470 patients enrolled, we observed 25 (5.3%) cases of CI-AKI. Patients with CI-AKI had received a higher renal function-adjusted CV (CV/eGFR 3.62 versus 1.96; P<0.001), and CI-AKI incidence was higher (15%; P<0.001) in patients in the highest quartile of CV/eGFR, corresponding to the cutoff indicated by the receiver-operating characteristic curve (>2.5; area under the curve, 0.77). At multivariable analysis, CV/eGFR above the cutoff (odds ratio, 5.57; P=0.002) remained an independent predictor of CI-AKI. The model with CV/eGFR demonstrated a statistically significantly net reclassification improvement of 0.23 (P=0.021) over the baseline preprocedural model, largely driven by a correct decrease in risk estimates for patients not experiencing CI-AKI, with a likelihood ratio χ(2) of 5.973 (P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: CV remains a key risk factor for CI-AKI after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and our study supports the need for minimizing CV, independently from baseline preprocedural risk. A CV restricted to no more than twice and a half the baseline eGFR might be valuable in reducing the risk of CI-AKI.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]