These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Low-dose CT for patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis: optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Author: Kim SH, Yoon JH, Lee JH, Lim YJ, Kim OH, Ryu JH, Son JH.
    Journal: Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):899-907. PubMed ID: 25118330.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: As there is increased concern over the radiation exposure particularly in adolescents and young adults, computed tomography (CT) dose reduction is needed in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. PURPOSE: To evaluate the optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) to obtain the best image quality on a 30-mAs applied low-dose CT (LDCT 30mAs) and to compare the diagnostic performances of the LDCT 30mAs with different SAFIRE strengths with that of the 100-mAs applied LDCT (LDCT 100mAs) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 102 consecutive patients (47 men, 55 women; mean age, 41.2 years; range, 15-82 years) with right lower quadrant pain underwent abdominal-pelvic CT, consisting of arterial phase LDCT 100mAs and portal venous phase LDCT30mAs under a fixed 120 kV. LDCT 30mAs images were reconstructed separately with five strength levels (S1-S5). Two blinded radiologists recorded scores for the subjective image quality of the LDCT 30mAs dataset (S0-S5) and confidence scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis on each dataset and LDCT 100mAs. CT image noise was measured for each set. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 58 patients with confirmed appendicitis and 44 without appendicitis. There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between LDCT 100mAs and LDCT 30mAs with any strength for both readers (AUC for reader 1, LDCT 30mAs with S0-S5 = 0.97, LDCT 100mAs = 0.93, P = 0.0936; for reader 2, LDCT 30mAs with S0-S5 = 0.96, LDCT 100mAs = 0.97, P = 0.128). The measured noise decreased as the strength increased from S0 to S5 (mean, 20.8 > 17.7 > 15.6 > 13.5 > 11.5 > 9.5, P < 0.0001). However, overall subjective image quality on S3 was better than the other strengths for both readers (S0 < S1 < S2 < S3 > S4 > S5, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Although measured noise declined as SAFIRE strength increased, S3 seems optimal for the best subjective image quality on LDCT 30mAs. The diagnostic performance of LDCT 30mAs with any strength is comparable to that of LDCT 100mAs for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]