These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparison of different types of diffusive gradient in thin film samplers for measurement of dissolved methylmercury in freshwaters. Author: Fernández-Gómez C, Bayona JM, Díez S. Journal: Talanta; 2014 Nov; 129():486-90. PubMed ID: 25127623. Abstract: Determination of bioavailable concentrations of methylmercury (MeHg(+)) in freshwater is key to further understanding its potential risk and toxicity. In this work, two in-house-manufactured mercury-specific diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) were used in laboratory to assess the lability of MeHg(+), and to develop a relationship between chemical lability and bioavailability. After diffusing through the diffusive gel, the MeHg(+) accumulated in a thiol functionalised resin gel was extracted using acidic thiourea that was analysed using aqueous-phase propylation followed by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography (GC) coupled to pyrolysis-atomic fluorescence spectrometry (Py-AFS) detection. The diffusion coefficient (D) at 25°C in agarose (A-DGT) in the absence and presence of dissolved organic matter (DOM) was obtained. Moreover, these values were experimentally compared against polyacrylamide (P-DGT), which is the most frequently used DGT for mercury to date. Statistically significant differences were observed between D values for A-DGT in the absence (3.15×10(-6) cm(2) s(-1)) and presence of DOM (2.68×10(-6) cm(2) s(-1)) and also for P-DGT (2.49×10(-6) and 1.69×10(-6) cm(2) s(-1)). Interestingly, our results show that diffusion of MeHg(+) was higher on agarose diffusive gel with and without DOM in comparison with those observed in polyacrylamide. Even with higher diffusion coefficients of MeHg(+) in the agarose diffusion layer, however, DGT based on polyacrylamide seems to be a better choice for eutrophic waters, when monitoring very low concentrations of MeHg(+), considering its slightly higher uptake capacity.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]