These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Triple valve surgery in the modern era: short- and long-term results from a single centre. Author: Lio A, Murzi M, Di Stefano G, Miceli A, Kallushi E, Ferrarini M, Solinas M, Glauber M. Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 19(6):978-84. PubMed ID: 25146323. Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Triple valve surgery (TVS) is still a challenge for surgeons because of prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and myocardial ischaemic times. The reported operative mortality rate for TVS ranges between 2.5 and 25%; long-term survival is also diminished, with reported survival rates at 5 and 10 years of 75-82 and 61-75%, respectively. The objective of our study is to define early and late clinical outcomes, reporting the initial experience in the treatment of triple valve disease through a minimally invasive approach. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected data on 106 patients who underwent TVS at our institution between October 2001 and June 2013. A total of 101 procedures were done through the standard median sternotomy; however, in 5 patients, the surgical procedure was carried out through a right minithoracotomy. Univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of early and late survival. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.6% (6 of 107 patients). Predictors of early mortality were: previous cardiac surgery [odds ratio (OR) 4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-5.2, P = 0.04], preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.1, P = 0.003), prolonged CPB time (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.01) and postoperative pulmonary complications (OR 8, 95% CI 5.8-41, P = 0.0001). Five- and 10-year survival rates were 85 ± 3 and 65 ± 9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, diabetes [hazard ratio (HR) 2.5, 95% CI 1-6.2, P = 0.045], preoperative dialysis (HR 3, 95% CI 2-4.7, P = 0.001), unstable angina (HR 4.8, 95% CI 1-18, P = 0.03), preoperative LVEF (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.1, P = 0.02), concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-5.7, P = 0.006), prolonged CPB time (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.13, P = 0.006), postoperative pacemaker (PMK) implantation (HR 6.2, 95% CI 1.3-18, P = 0.01) and postoperative pulmonary complications (HR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1-7.3, P = 0.002) were found to be significant predictors of late mortality following TVS. The freedom rates from valve-related complications and reoperation at 10 years were 95 ± 2 and 97 ± 2%, respectively. The 10-year freedom rates from thromboembolism and anticoagulation-related haemorrhage were 88 ± 5 and 88 ± 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TVS offers encouraging short-term and long-term patient survival; these good results after TVS in patients with advanced valvular heart disease justify aggressive surgical therapy in these patients. TVS with a minimally invasive approach is feasible and could be another treatment option.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]