These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of HIV antigen/antibody screening using a chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay.
    Author: Cui C, Liu P, Feng Z, Xin R, Yan C, Li Z.
    Journal: J Virol Methods; 2015 Mar; 214():33-6. PubMed ID: 25173424.
    Abstract:
    Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening assays have improved from single-antigen detection to detection of antigen-antibody combinations. However, concerns have been raised over the potential for false-positive results in antigen-antibody combination assays. The present study investigated the clinical effectiveness of HIV antigen/antibody (HIV Ag/Ab) combination screening by chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) in over 88,000 samples from an HIV low-prevalence area of Beijing, China. The HIV Ag/Ab CMIA screening results were consistent with those obtained by Western blot and HIV-RNA testing, and had an accuracy of 99.74% (Kappa index=0.98). False-positive results were more common for women affected by clinical interfering factors (e.g., kidney disease, tumors) than for men (80.95% vs. 15.09%, P<0.001). When CMIA signal-to-cutoff ratio (S/CO) was 11.26, the sensitivity and specificity were highest (100%, 99.43%), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.998. Specimens that were negative by CMIA (S/CO <1) were all negative by HIV-RNA testing. These results indicate that HIV Ag/Ab CMIA has a good clinical performance; however, some clinical interfering factors should be considered in HIV low-prevalence areas for their potential to skew testing results.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]