These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Are there any differences between myocardial infarction with Q and non-Q in ECG]. Author: Arriagada D, Corbalán R, Serrat H, Marchant E, Casanegra P, Chavez A. Journal: Rev Med Chil; 1989 Jun; 117(6):636-40. PubMed ID: 2519412. Abstract: Recent literature provides evidence that Non-Q wave myocardial infarction (Non-Q MI) has a different intrahospital course and prognosis than Q-wave myocardial infarction (Q-MI). We evaluated clinical and laboratory characteristics, complications and therapeutic requirements of 557 consecutive patients, 440 with Q-MI and 117 with Non-Q MI. Risk factors for coronary artery disease did not differ among groups. Non-Q MI patients had a significantly higher incidence of previous cardiac events such as myocardial infarction, angina pectoris and heart failure. Peak CPK enzyme values were significantly lower in Non Q MI patients (952 +/- 753 vs 1,743 +/- 1,425 VI/l p less than 0.05). Early complications were different for both groups: The incidence of heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias and conduction defects was lower in Non-Q MI patients while the incidence of unstable angina pectoris and need for aorto coronary by-pass surgery was higher (18 vs 12%, 17 vs 7% respectively, p less than 0.05). Mortality was not different (8.4% in Non-Q MI vs 12.3% in Q MI). Thus, Non Q MI appears to have a more benign clinical course than Q-MI in terms of less complications such as heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias and conduction defects. However, Non-Q MI is a potentially unstable clinical entity with a higher incidence of early post MI angina pectoris requiring a more aggressive medical and surgical therapy.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]