These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Association between BRCA1 rs799917 polymorphism and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis of 19,878 subjects.
    Author: Qin TT, Chen T, Zhang Q, Du HN, Shu YQ, Luo K, Zhu LJ.
    Journal: Biomed Pharmacother; 2014 Sep; 68(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 25194442.
    Abstract:
    Studies investigating the association between the BRCA1 rs799917 polymorphism and breast cancer risk have reported controversial results. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis. A total of 8 articles comprising 19,878 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by Stata 11 software. Heterogeneity tests were conducted by Q test with I(2) value, and publication bias assessment was performed by Begg's funnel plot and Egger's test. The pooled results did not show any sufficient evidence approving the association between the BRCA1 rs799917 polymorphism and breast cancer risk in total population (T vs C: OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.97-1.06; TT vs CC: OR=1.03, 95% CI=0.93-1.13; CT vs CC: OR=1.04, 95% CI=0.92-1.16; TT+CT vs CC: OR=1.04, 95% CI=0.94-1.15; TT vs CT+CC: OR=1.03, 95% CI=0.94-1.12). In the further subgroup analyses, no significant associations were found in any comparison models according to ethnicity and source of controls. No publication bias was observed in this meta-analysis. In summary, based on the overall results, this meta-analysis strongly suggests that the BRCA1 rs799917 polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer risk.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]