These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Transcranial magnetic stimulation in sleep fragmentation: a model to better understand sleep disorders.
    Author: Scalise A, Pittaro-Cadore I, Serafini A, Simeoni S, Fratticci L, Ecoretti E, Gigli GL.
    Journal: Sleep Med; 2014 Nov; 15(11):1386-91. PubMed ID: 25194582.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate practice-dependent plasticity and cortical inhibition/excitability in good sleepers after a night of sleep fragmentation (SF), by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). METHODS: In basal condition (BC), after a full night of spontaneous sleep, and in fragmented condition (FC), after a fragmented night of sleep, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, motor threshold (MT), silent period (SP), and intracortical inhibition were assessed. In both conditions subjects performed, also, a bimanual motor task: MEPs were recorded before and after exercise, and after rest. We evaluated the presence of post-exercise facilitation and delayed facilitation. Subjects reported their alertness level (Stanford Sleepiness Scale-SSS). RESULTS: MT and SSS were significantly increased in SF. Instead, no significant differences for MEP amplitude or SP or intracortical inhibition were found. In both conditions post-exercise facilitation and delayed facilitation were present. CONCLUSION: SF produces disruption of nocturnal sleep and increases daytime sleepiness. Confirmatory features of this clinical behaviour could be that in FC we observed a significant increase in SSS and in MT. SF was unable to modify cortical inhibition\excitability and\or to influence plasticity-related parameters. These results seem inconsistent with some of TMS alterations observed in sleep deprivation (SD) and restless legs syndrome (RLS). We suggest that SD and SF represent different phenomena that can depend on various networks acting on motor cortex. We speculate that alterations in cortical excitability found in RLS are intrinsically related to the underlying disease itself and are not instead directly associated with the SF present in RLS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]