These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is topical corticosteroid necessary in traumatic hyphema?
    Author: Türkoğlu EB, Celik T, Celik E, Ozkan N, Bursalı O, Coşkun SB, Alagoz G.
    Journal: J Fr Ophtalmol; 2014 Oct; 37(8):613-7. PubMed ID: 25199483.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes in the management of traumatic hyphema treated with topical corticosteroid plus supportive therapy versus only supportive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 206 patients were divided into two groups; group I, 98 eyes were treated with topical corticosteroid 12 × 1 and supportive therapy including bed rest, keeping the head elevated (45 degrees), and hydration. In group II, 108 eyes were treated with only supportive therapy. Hyphema size, initial and final visual acuities and intraocular pressure, time to hyphema clearance, and incidence of rebleeding were evaluated. RESULTS: The time needed for hyphema resorption in the two groups were 60.25 ± 33.9 and 62.3 ± 28.9 hours respectively (P=0.62). There was no significant difference in rebleeding rate between the topical corticosteroid group (4.01%) and non-steroid group (6.48%) (P=0.67). The initial and final visual acuities were similar in the two groups (P=0.86). In Groups I and II, the average intraocular pressures were 19.7 ± 8.01 and 14.2 ± 10.2 mmHg respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Patients who were treated with topical corticosteroids were no less likely to experience a rebleed or a poor visual outcome than those treated with supportive therapy alone. Supportive therapy alone may be convenient and cost-effective management strategy in uncomplicated traumatic hyphema.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]