These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Treatment response to antioxidants and zinc based on CFH and ARMS2 genetic risk allele number in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study.
    Author: Awh CC, Hawken S, Zanke BW.
    Journal: Ophthalmology; 2015 Jan; 122(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 25200399.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of complement factor H (CFH) and age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2 (ARMS2) risk alleles on the observed response to components of the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formulation. DESIGN: Genetic and statistical subgroup analysis of a randomized, prospective clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: White patients from the AREDS with category 3 or 4 age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with available DNA (n = 989). METHODS: Four genotype groups based on CFH and ARMS2 risk allele number were defined. Progression to advanced AMD was analyzed by genotype and treatment using Cox proportionate hazards estimates and 7-year events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of predefined genotype group on treatment-specific progression to advanced AMD. RESULTS: Patients with 2 CFH risk alleles and no ARMS2 risk alleles progressed more with zinc-containing treatment compared with placebo, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.07 (P = 0.0196) for zinc and 2.73 (P = 0.0418) for AREDS formulation (AF). Seven-year treatment-specific progression rates were: placebo, 17.0%; zinc, 43.2% (P = 0.023); and AF, 40.2% (P = 0.039). Patients with 0 or 1 CFH risk alleles and 1 or 2 ARMS2 risk alleles benefited from zinc-containing treatment compared with placebo, with an HR of 0.514 for zinc (P = 0.012) and 0.569 for AF (P = 0.0254). Seven-year treatment-specific AMD progression rates were as follows: placebo, 43.3%; zinc, 25.2% (P = 0.020); and AF, 27.3% (P = 0.011). Zinc and AF treatment each interacted statistically with these 2 genotype groups under a Cox model, with P values of 0.000999 and 0.00366, respectively. For patients with 0 or 1 CFH risk alleles and no ARMS2 risk alleles, neither zinc-containing treatment altered progression compared with placebo, but treatment with antioxidants decreased progression (HR, 0.380; P = 0.034). Seven-year progression with placebo was 22.6% and with antioxidants was 9.17% (P = 0.033). For patients with 2 CFH risk alleles and 1 or 2 ARMS2 risk alleles, no treatment was better than placebo (48.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of the AREDS formulation seems the result of a favorable response by patients in only 1 genotype group, balanced by neutral or unfavorable responses in 3 genotype groups.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]