These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Health care situation of patients with suspected sepsis in a German emergency department]. Author: Geier F, Greve Y, Popp S, Achterberg A, Glöckner E, Ziegler R, Heppner HJ, Mang H, Christ M. Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2014 Sep; 139(38):1869-75. PubMed ID: 25203545. Abstract: BACKGROUND: The in-hospital mortality of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (ssss) is high. Of note, little is known about the health care situation of patients with sepsis in German emergency departments. The aim of the study was to analyze whether sepsis patients are treated according to current guidelines, to identify the treatment sites within the hospital and to evaluate the death rate of affected patients during index hospitalization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-centre, prospective and observational trial we analyzed consecutive patients with complaints of sepsis during August and September 2012. RESULTS: During the study period 151 patients presented with complaints of sepsis (age 68.3 ± 18 years, 54.3% men, 45% with ssss, in-hospital mortality of the overall cohort: 14.6%). The Surviving Sepsis Campaign three hour bundle (lactate, blood cultures, broad spectrum antibiotics, and volume) was carried out in 54.2% of patients with ssss. In case of ssss, broad spectrum antibiotics were initiated in the emergency department in 85.4%. Patients with ssss were admitted to wards with usual care in 67.2%, in 32.8% they were admitted to an intensive or intermediate care unit. The in-hospital mortality of patients with ssss during their index hospitalization was 27.8%. CONCLUSION: Despite the high in-hospital mortality rate, more than two thirds of the patients with ssss were admitted to wards with usual care. We call for action 1) to early identify affected patients, 2) to provide adequate risk stratification tools and 3) to realize an early disposition of patients to the appropriate care units.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]