These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Myocardial contractility, blood flow, and oxygen consumption in healthy dogs during anesthesia with isoflurane or enflurane.
    Author: Conzen PF, Hobbhahn J, Goetz AE, Habazettl H, Granetzny T, Peter K, Brendel W.
    Journal: J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1989 Feb; 3(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 2520643.
    Abstract:
    Left ventricular contractility (Vmax), myocardial blood flow (MBF), and oxygen consumption (O2C) were determined together with systemic hemodynamic parameters in a total of 21 mongrel dogs. Baseline recordings were obtained under basal anesthetic conditions with a narcotic (piritramid, IV). In the control group (n = 7), recordings were obtained during a three-hour observation period with infusion of piritramid. In experimental groups measurements were repeated with equi-anesthetic concentrations of isoflurane (0.7 and 1.4 vol%; n = 8) and enflurane (1.1 and 2.2 vol%; n = 6). Dose-dependent reductions of arterial pressure, cardiac output (CO) and peripheral vascular resistance were observed with isoflurane and enflurane. CO at the higher anesthetic level was depressed significantly more with enflurane. This difference was obviously due to a more severe depression of myocardial contractility with enflurane; Vmax was decreased by 18% and 26% with enflurane, but only by 10% and 17% with isoflurane (P less than 0.01). MBF and the fraction of CO received by the heart were increased above their baseline values with both concentrations of isoflurane. In contrast, the fraction of CO remained constant with enflurane while MBF decreased. O2C was reduced due to decreases of afterload and left ventricular contractility. The reduction was greater with enflurane than with isoflurane. All parameters remained unchanged in the control group. The results of this study indicate that the most striking difference in the actions of isoflurane and enflurane on cardiac parameters is on myocardial vascular resistance; MBF is increased with isoflurane, but is decreased with enflurane although myocardial perfusion pressure is reduced by almost identical amounts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]