These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Motivations and experiences of patients seeking cross-border reproductive care: the Australian and New Zealand context.
    Author: Rodino IS, Goedeke S, Nowoweiski S.
    Journal: Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1422-31. PubMed ID: 25241371.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the motivations, clinical care, counseling, and support experiences of Australian and New Zealand participants considering or having participated in cross-border reproductive care (CBRC). DESIGN: Questionnaire-based study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): One hundred thirty-seven Australian and New Zealand participants aged 23-53 years. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES(S): Quantitative and qualitative responses to an anonymously completed online questionnaire. RESULT(S): Quantitative responses from participants indicated that motivations for engaging in CBRC included limited availability of gamete donors in their home state, difficulty in meeting treatment eligibility criteria, and treatment being legally prohibited. Experiences of CBRC were generally rated positively in terms of medical needs (91.2%), safety (89.4%), and costs (85.7%), although rated more conservatively to emotional needs being met (57.9%). Less than half the sample (47.5%) had accessed some form of CBRC-related counseling. Themes identified in qualitative analysis reflected gamete supply and demand issues, the importance of donor information and disclosure, the personal impact of legislation, and ongoing support needs after CBRC treatment. CONCLUSION(S): A greater percentage of participants agreed that their CBRC clinic satisfied their overall medical needs and treatment expectations in comparison with overall emotional needs. Participants indicated access to post-treatment support counseling particularly with regard to their emotional well-being and disclosure issues to donor-conceived children would be useful. The implications of our findings for the provision of best-practice psychosocial counseling support and development of counseling guidelines are highlighted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]