These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Incidental focal uptake in colorectal location on oncologic ¹⁸FDG PET and PET/CT studies: histopathological findings and clinical significances.
    Author: Fuertes J, Montagut C, Bullich S, Coma MI, Mestre-Fusco A, Suárez-Piñera M, Trampal C, Bellmunt J.
    Journal: Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2015; 34(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 25263718.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Unexpected focal colonic or rectal radiotracer activity is an usual finding in patients subjected to a PET study. The aim of this work has been to evaluate the clinical significance of this finding in the prediction of an existing colorectal malignancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During the last three years, all patients studied with (18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET for oncologic work-up purposes were prospectively surveyed for focal colorectal radiotracer activity. Colonoscopy was performed in all patients with this incidental finding in order to exclude colonic malignancy. CEA level, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), CT findings, colonoscopy findings and histopathological results were prospectively analyzed in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 2290 patients were evaluated, 158 of whom were studied with PET and the remainder with a hybrid PET/CT. Focal FDG colorectal activity was incidentally detected in 27 patients with no previous history of colorectal cancer. Colorectal adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in seven (25.9%) patients. A pre-cancerous lesion was found in eleven patients (40.7%). Eight patients (29.6%) had no macroscopic lesions. One patient was diagnosed with a benign lesion. Any focal activity found in the colon by (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination predicts a probability greater than 50% of an underlying malignant or premalignant lesion in the histopathological analysis (logistic regression, p=0.01), independently of the calculated SUVmax. CONCLUSION: According to the results of the present study, we recommend the performance of a colonoscopy and biopsy of any suspicious lesions, in all patients with unexpected focal FDG activity found in colon or rectum during a (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]