These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: No association of the TGF-β1 29T/C polymorphism with breast cancer risk in Caucasian and Asian populations: evidence from a meta-analysis involving 55,841 subjects.
    Author: Alqumber MA, Dar SA, Haque S, Wahid M, Singh R, Akhter N.
    Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(20):8725-34. PubMed ID: 25374198.
    Abstract:
    The transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) gene 29 T/C polymorphism is thought to be associated with breast cancer risk. However, reports are largely conflicting and underpowered. We therefore conducted a meta- analysis of all available case-control studies relating the TGF-β1 29T/C polymorphism to the risk of developing breast cancer by including a total of 31 articles involving 24,021 cases and 31,820 controls. Pooled ORs were generated for the allele contrasts, with additive genetic, dominant genetic and recessive genetic models. Subgroup analysis was also performed by ethnicity for the TGF-β1 29T/C polymorphism. No association was found in the overall analysis (C vs T: OR=1.028, 95% CI=0.949-1.114, p-value 0.500; CC vs TC: OR=1.022, 95% CI=0.963- 1.085, p-value 0.478; CC vs TT: OR=1.054, 95% CI=0.898-1.236, p-value 0.522; CC vs TT+TC: OR=1.031, 95% CI=0.946-1.124, p-value 0.482; TT vs CC+TC: OR=0.945, 95% CI=0.827-1.080, p-value 0.403). Similarly, in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no association was found in Caucasian (C vs T: OR=1.041, 95% CI=0.932-1.162, p-value 0.475; CC vs TC: OR=1.031, 95% CI=0.951-1.118, p-value 0.464; CC vs TT: OR=1.081, 95% CI=0.865- 1.351, p-value 0.493; CC vs TT+TC: OR=1.047, 95% CI=0.929-1.180, p-value 0.453; TT vs CC+TC: OR= 0.929, 95% CI=0.775-1.114, p-value 0.429;) and Asian populations (C vs T: OR=1.004, 95% CI=0.908-1.111, p-value 0.931; CC vs TC: OR= 0.991, 95% CI=0.896-1.097, p-value 0.865; CC vs TT: OR=1.015, 95% CI=0.848-1.214, p-value 0.871; CC vs TT+TC: OR=1.000, 95% CI=0.909-1.101, p-value 0.994; TT vs CC+TC: OR= 0.967, 95% CI=0.808-1.159, p-value 0.720;). No evidence of publication bias was detected during the analysis. No significant association with breast cancer risk was demonstrated overall or on subgroup (Caucasian and Asian) analysis. It can be concluded that TGF-β1 29T/C polymorphism does not play a role in breast cancer susceptibility in overall or ethnicity-specific manner.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]