These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banded plication: case-matched study from a single U.S. center.
    Author: Chaudhry UI, Osayi SN, Suzo AJ, Noria SF, Mikami DJ, Needleman BJ.
    Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 25443058.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banded plication (LAGBP) is a novel technique for weight loss surgery. This study evaluates the safety and short-term efficacy of LAGBP in a U.S. population. The setting was an academic medical center in the United States. METHODS: Patients who underwent LAGBP between 2012 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, pre and perioperative details, body mass index (BMI), and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) were analyzed and compared to case-matched cohorts that had laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) during the same time period. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (14 females) underwent LAGBP during the study period and were case-matched based on age, sex, race, and preoperative BMI with patients having LAGB and LSG. Mean age and preoperative BMI for LAGBP cohort were 42.5±11.6 years and 47.7±6.5 kg/m2, respectively. Mean operative time and estimated blood loss were 72±16 minutes and 23±23 mL, respectively, compared to 49±16 minutes (P=.002) and 15±23 mL for LAGB, and 66±18 minutes and 36±22 mL for LSG. There were no perioperative deaths. Hospital length of stay was 1.1±.3 days for LAGBP, versus .7±.3 days (P=.004) for LAGB, and 2.7±1.4 days (P<.001) for LSG. At 12-month follow-up, patients in the LAGBP and LAGB groups had undergone similar number of band adjustments (4.7 versus 5.1; P=.68). The %EWL was 46.1±14.8% for the LAGBP cohort, compared to 38.9±20.6% for LAGB, and 57.7±16% for LSG. CONCLUSION: LAGBP is technically feasible and safe, and offers weight loss results positioned between LAGB and LSG at 1 year. To date, this is the largest U.S. series to compare this novel technique to more traditional weight loss procedures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]