These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: U6 is not a suitable endogenous control for the quantification of circulating microRNAs.
    Author: Xiang M, Zeng Y, Yang R, Xu H, Chen Z, Zhong J, Xie H, Xu Y, Zeng X.
    Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2014 Nov 07; 454(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 25450382.
    Abstract:
    Recently, microRNAs have been detected in serum and plasma, and circulating microRNA (miRNA) profiles have now been associated with many diseases such as cancers and heart disease, as well as altered physiological states. Because of their stability and disease resistance, circulation miRNAs appear to be an ideal material for biomarkers of diseases and physiological states in blood. However, the lack of a suitable internal reference gene (internal reference miRNA) has hampered research and application of circulating miRNAs. Currently, U6 and miR-16 are the most common endogenous controls in the research of miRNAs in tissues and cells. We performed microarray-based serum miRNA profiling on the serum of 20 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and 20 controls to detect the expressions of U6 and miRNAs. Profiling was followed by real-time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) in 80 patients (20 each with gastric cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer) and 30 non-cancerous controls. qPCR was also performed to detect miRNAs in serum with repeated freezing and thawing. The results of microarray showed that with the exception of U6, Ct values of miR-16, miR-24, miR-142-3p, miR-19b and miR-192 in serum samples of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were greater than control samples. The results of 110 cases showed large fluctuations in U6 expression. The difference between the greatest and the least levels of expression was 3.29 for delta Ct values, and 1.23 for miR-16. The expressions of U6, miR-16 and miR-24 in serum subjected to different freeze-thaw cycles showed that U6 expression gradually decreased after 1, 2, and 4 cycles of freezing and thawing, while the expression of miR-16 and miR-24 remained relatively stable. Collectively, our results suggested that U6 is unsuitable as an internal reference gene in the research of circulating miRNAs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]