MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging in simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging for whole-body staging of women with pelvic malignancies.
Author: Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt BM, Beiderwellen K, Schulze-Hagen A, Heubner M, Kinner S, Forsting M, Lauenstein T, Ruhlmann V, Umutlu L.
Journal: J Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 55(12):1930-5. PubMed ID: 25453042.
Abstract:
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic benefit of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in an (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging protocol for whole-body staging of women with primary or recurrent malignancies of the pelvis. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with a primary pelvic malignancy or suspected recurrence of a pelvic malignancy were included in our study. All patients underwent a whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging examination that included DWI. Two radiologists separately evaluated the PET/MR imaging datasets without DWI followed by a second interpretation with DWI. First, both readers identified all primary tumors, as well as lymph node and distant metastases. In a second session, PET and DWI data were assessed qualitatively. Image interpretation comprised lesion conspicuity defined as visual lesion-to-background contrast (4-point ordinal scale) and diagnostic confidence (3-point ordinal scale) for all tumors. The results from histopathologic examination and cross-sectional imaging follow-up (≥6 mo) were used as the reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the significance of differences between obtained values. RESULTS: Among the 122 suspected lesions seen, 98 (80.3%) were considered malignant. PET/MR imaging without DWI had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of 92.9%, 87.5%, 96.8%, 75.0%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the detection of malignant lesions. PET/MR imaging with DWI had slightly higher values (94.9%, 83.3%, 95.9%, 80.0%, and 92.6%, respectively), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). In the qualitative assessment of lesion-to-background contrast, PET had significantly (P < 0.05) higher values (3.79 ± 0.58) than DWI (3.63 ± 0.77). Furthermore, significantly (P < 0.05) higher scores were found for diagnostic confidence using PET (2.68 ± 0.64) for the determination of malignant lesions, when compared with DWI (2.53 ± 0.69). CONCLUSION: DWI in PET/MR imaging has no diagnostic benefit for whole-body staging of women with pelvic malignancies. The omission of DWI for staging or restaging gynecologic cancer may significantly reduce examination times, thus increasing patient comfort without a relevant decrease in diagnostic competence.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]