These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intraoperative condyle positioning by sonographic monitoring in orthognathic surgery verified by MRI.
    Author: Bethge LS, Ballon A, Mack M, Landes C.
    Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 25457463.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Repositioning of the jaw in orthognathic surgery must produce precise and stable long-term results; an effective and practical method of intraoperative condyle positioning is required to achieve this. Most traditional methods, such as manual positioning or positioning plates do not permit intraoperative monitoring of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) position. This study evaluates the results of intraoperative, sonographically-monitored joint positioning, comparing preoperative and postoperative MRI scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 97 patients who were originally assessed (53 female, average age 29 ± 10.93; and 44 male, average age 28 ± 9.25), 21 had incomplete data sets and were excluded, leaving 76 evaluable patients. MRIs were performed preoperatively between 2 days and 100 weeks (median 30.5 days), and postoperatively between 12 and 96 weeks (median 150 days). Condyle positioning, intercondylar distance, and disc degeneration and dislocation were compared in preoperative and postoperative MRIs, and differentiated by Angle class on horizontal, axial and sagittal scans. Condyle to fossa distances were measured on parasagittal images from 0° (the vertical sagittal plane), 45° anteriorly and 45° posteriorly. The intercondylar distances between the condylar head midpoints were measured on axial sections. Two-sided t-tests (α < 0.05) were used for comparisons within classes; the interclass correlation was performed using univariate ANOVA and linear correlation for paired sample correlation settings. RESULTS: In 27 Angle class II cases, the anterior distance of both condyles increased on average 0.3 ± 1.0 mm, the posterior position decreased 0.1 ± 1.2 mm, and the vertical position decreased 0.2 ± 1.1 mm postoperatively. In 47 Angle class III cases the anterior distance of both condyles increased on average 0.3 ± 0.8 mm, the posterior 0.1 ± 0.8 mm and the vertical distance 0.1 ± 0.8 mm postoperatively. All alterations of the condyle-fossa relation were non-significant except for the anterior distance in Angle class ІІІ (p = 0.02). Alterations of the disc position and disc degeneration were non-significant in class II. In class ІІІ, the disc degeneration deteriorated slightly on the left side (p = 0.02). Intercondylar distance increased 1 ± 5.5 mm in class ІІ and decreased by 1 ± 5.5 mm in class ІІІ postoperatively, alterations were non-significant. CONCLUSION: Sonography is a non-invasive, comfortable, fast, economical and effective intraoperative method of condyle positioning. The results of the present study support this statement because the degree of disc degeneration and luxation remained unaltered and the condyle position did not change significantly. Prospective randomized comparison to manual positioning is in preparation and will be conducted in the near future.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]