These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dynamic MR imaging of temporomandibular joint: an initial assessment with fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition sequence.
    Author: Sun Q, Dong MJ, Tao XF, Yu Q, Li KC, Yang C.
    Journal: Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 33(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 25461305.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The study was aimed to determine and optimize the parameters for the MR fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) sequence, which was to obtain an acceptable image to evaluate the value of the movement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). METHODS: In this investigation, 20 volunteers were examined to determine and optimize the parameters of the FIESTA sequence. Then, 160 TMJs from 80 patients with temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) of clinical suspicion were consecutively performed by both static MRI and dynamic FIESTA MRI on the oblique sagittal position. The FIESTA MR images of TMJs were obtained from a slow, consecutive, free and open-closed movement. Based on the cycles of TMJ movements during the process of FIESTA MRI (90seconds), we classified all TMJs into 2 groups: cycles of open-closed mouths less than or equal to 3 (group 1) and more than 3 (group 2). Each image was marked level 1-3 by its quality. Meanwhile, the location of articular disc, mandibular condyle, motive artifact, "jumping sign" and the joint effusion in each TMJ were assessed respectively. RESULTS: By dynamic FIESTA MRI among 160 TMJs, 92 TMJs (57.50%) were in group 1, and 68 TMJs were (42.50%) in group 2. There were statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2(p<0.05). It was shown that the number of "level 3" in group 1 was greater than group 2, and the number of "level 1" in group 1 was less than group 2. The phenomenon of motion artifact and "jumping sign" were much significantly higher in group 2 than those in group 1 (p<0.01). Furthermore, in all of the "jumping sign" cases, the phenomenon of "jumping sign" was significantly higher in group ADDwR than in group ADDw/oR (p<0.01). There was a statistically significant correlation between disc-condyle complex in "jumping sign" phenomenon and group ADDwR (r=0.621, p<0.05). The data with the false matching rate of 31.52% showed that the maximum motion range on the dynamic imaging was greater than the static imaging. Among 160 TMJs, joint effusions of 37 TMJs (23.13%) were identified by dynamic FIESTA-MRI. Among 79 TMJs with ADDw/oR(anterior disc displacement without reduction), 42 sides were operated with Maxillofacial arthroscopy surgery. The surgical result was in agreement with the MR result. CONCLUSION: Most TMJs images with a slow free open-close movement (cycles≦3) could be successfully obtained by the dynamic FIESTA MRI. The FIESTA MRI might be considered as an additional method to evaluate the movement of the articular disk and the mandibular condyle.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]