These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Role of dermal exposure in systemic intake of methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) among construction and boat building workers.
    Author: Henriks-Eckerman ML, Mäkelä EA, Laitinen J, Ylinen K, Suuronen K, Vuokko A, Sauni R.
    Journal: Toxicol Lett; 2015 Feb 03; 232(3):595-600. PubMed ID: 25542146.
    Abstract:
    The causal relationship between inhalation exposure to methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and the risk of occupational asthma is well known, but the role of dermal exposure and dermal uptake of MDI in this process is still unclear. The aims of this study were to measure dermal exposure to and the dermal uptake of MDI among workers (n=24) who regularly handle MDI-urethanes. Dermal exposure was measured by the tape-strip technique from four sites on the dominant hand and arm. The workers with the highest exposure (n=5) were biomonitored immediately after their work shift, in the evening and the next morning, using urinary 4,4´methylenedianiline (MDA) as a marker. Dermal uptake was evaluated by comparing workers' MDA excretions both when they were equipped with respiratory protective devices (RPDs) and when they did not use them. The measured amounts of MDI on their hands varied from below 0.1 to 17 μg/10 cm(2) during the test. MDI concentrations were in the range of 0.08 to 27 μg m(-3) in the breathing zone outside the RPDs. MDA concentrations varied from 0.1 to 0.2 μmol mol(-1) creatinine during the test period. The decreasing effect of RPDs on inhalation exposure was absent in the next morning urine samples; this excretion pattern might be an indication of dermal uptake of MDI.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]