These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in PBSC mobilization for autologous hematopoietic SCT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Author: Kim MG, Han N, Lee EK, Kim T.
    Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant; 2015 Apr; 50(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 25581410.
    Abstract:
    Trial outcomes comparing cytokine agents for PBSC mobilization in autologous hematopoietic transplant patients have been controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence available on pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in chemo-cytokine mobilization. Electronic literature searches of PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL identified nine articles eligible for qualitative analysis with one randomized controlled trial. Eight articles involving 719 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed similar CD34+ cell collection yields for pegfilgrastim and filgrastim (SDM -0.08, 95% CI: -0.388 to 0.228). On comparison with filgrastim, pegfilgrastim showed a significantly earlier apheresis onset time (SDM: -0.512, 95% CI: -0.973 to -0.050) and reduction in required apheresis procedures (SDM -0.260, 95% CI: -0.466 to -0.054). Times to leukocyte (⩾1.0 × 10(9)/L) and platelet (⩾20 × 10(9)/L) recovery were similar between groups (SDM: 0.015, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.44 and SDM: 0.309, 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.72, respectively). Both agents were well tolerated and mild bone pain was the most frequently reported adverse event. Pegfilgrastim may be a convenient alternative to filgrastim in PBSC mobilization for multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients, but further studies are required to clarify effects of cytokine dosage and previous cytotoxic exposure in specific subpopulations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]