These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Percutaneous epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit: outcomes and electrocardiogram correlates of success.
    Author: Santangeli P, Marchlinski FE, Zado ES, Benhayon D, Hutchinson MD, Lin D, Frankel DS, Riley MP, Supple GE, Garcia FC, Bala R, Desjardins B, Callans DJ, Dixit S.
    Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2015 Apr; 8(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 25637596.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Percutaneous epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit is limited by the presence of major coronary vessels and epicardial fat. We report the outcomes of percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit and the ECG features associated with successful ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2003 and December 2012, a total of 23 consecutive patients (49 ± 14 years; 39% men) with ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit underwent percutaneous epicardial instrumentation for mapping and ablation because of unsuccessful ablation from the coronary venous system and multiple endocardial LV/right ventricular sites. Successful epicardial ablation was achieved in 5 (22%) patients. In the remaining 18 (78%) cases, ablation was aborted for either close proximity to major coronary arteries or poor energy delivery over epicardial fat. The Q-wave amplitude ratio in aVL/aVR was higher in the successful group, with a ratio of > 1.85 present in 4 (80%) patients in the successful group versus 2 (11%) in the unsuccessful group (P = 0.008). The ratio of R/S wave in V1 was greater in the successful group, with 4 (80%) patients in the successful group having a R/S ratio of > 2 in V1 versus 5 (28%) in the unsuccessful group (P = 0.056). None of the patients in the successful group had an initial q wave in lead V1, as opposed to 6 (33%) in the unsuccessful group. The presence of at least 2 of the 3 ECG criteria above predicted successful ablation with 100% sensitivity and 72% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial instrumentation for mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit is successful only in a minority of patients because of close proximity to major coronary arteries and epicardial fat. A Q-wave ratio of > 1.85 in aVL/aVR, a R/S ratio of > 2 in V1, and absence of q waves in lead V1 help identify appropriate candidates for epicardial ablation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]