These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Midfacial volumetric and upper lip soft tissue changes after Le Fort I advancement of the cleft maxilla.
    Author: Susarla SM, Berli JU, Kumar A.
    Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):708-18. PubMed ID: 25649014.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To analyze, using 3-dimensional photogrammetric data, midfacial soft tissue and volumetric changes in the cleft maxilla after 1- or 2-piece Le Fort I (LF1) advancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with cleft and maxillary hypoplasia who underwent LF1 advancement. The primary predictor variable was the type of advancement (1 piece vs 2 pieces). Outcome measurements were changes in soft tissue linear measurements (subnasale [Sn], labium superius [LS], and stomion [SO]) and midfacial volume after maxillary advancement. RESULTS: Eleven patients (7 male, 4 female) underwent LF1 advancements (4 underwent 2-piece advancement). The mean maxillary advancement was 6.2 ± 1.7 mm. Soft tissue changes at the Sn, LS, and SO were 5.2 ± 2.0, 5.8 ± 2.5, and 5.2 ± 1.8 mm, respectively. The average volume change was 12.2 ± 5.7 cm(3). The mean ratios of soft tissue change to the amount of maxillary advancement (millimeters per millimeter) at the Sn, LS, and SO were 0.89 ± 0.49, 0.97 ± 0.44, and 0.89 ± 0.34, respectively. Volume increased by 2.1 ± 1.3 cm(3)/mm. Patients undergoing 1-piece advancement had greater mean advancement and greater soft tissue changes at the LS and SO (P < .03). After controlling for the amount of advancement, 1-piece LF1 osteotomy showed significantly greater improvements at the LS and SO (P < .04). CONCLUSIONS: Midface advancement at the LF1 level in patients with cleft consistently expands upper lip soft tissue and midfacial volume. Greater changes at the LS and SO were seen with 1-piece than with 2-piece osteotomy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]