These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: The role of smoking status on the progression-free survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations receiving first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus platinum doublet chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Author: Hasegawa Y, Ando M, Maemondo M, Yamamoto S, Isa S, Saka H, Kubo A, Kawaguchi T, Takada M, Rosell R, Kurata T, Ou SH. Journal: Oncologist; 2015 Mar; 20(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 25657199. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Univariate analyses from several randomized phase III trials seemed to suggest ever-smokers with advanced mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) did not seem to benefit from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment when compared with platinum-doublet chemotherapy as measured by progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: A literature-based meta-analysis of PFS outcomes as measured by log-transformed pooled hazard ratio (HR) was performed using a random-effect model. Pooled HRs for smoking status, age, gender, ethnicity, type of EGFR mutation, and EGFR TKI were obtained. Comparison of the pooled HR was performed by metaregression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 1,649 EGFRm NSCLC patients analyzed from 7 prospective randomized trials (WJTOG3405, NEJ002, EURTAC, OPTIMAL, LUX Lung-3, LUX Lung-6, and ENSURE), 83.7% were Asians, and 30.0% were ever-smokers. An equal percentage of ever-smokers received doublet chemotherapy (30.2%) or EGFR TKI (30.0%). The pooled HR for PFS was 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.39) for never-smokers and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.38-0.76) for ever-smokers (p < .007 by metaregression). The pooled PFS HR for exon 19 deletion was 0.25 (95% CI: 0.19-0.31) and 0.44 for exon 21 substitution (95% CI: 0.34-0.57) (p < .001 by metaregression analysis). The pooled PFS HR was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.46) for Asians and 0.48 for non-Asians (95% CI: 0.28-0.84) (p = .261 by metaregression analysis). CONCLUSION: EGFRm NSCLC patients derived significant PFS benefit from TKI over platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment regardless of smoking status; however, PFS benefit is significantly better in never-smokers by metaregression analysis. 摘要背景。来自几项 III 期随机试验的单变量分析似乎提示:通过无进展生存期 (PFS) 进行测量,与铂类双药化疗相比时,患有表皮生长因子受体突变 (EGFRm) 晚期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 的过去吸烟者似乎未从一线EGFR 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 (TKI) 治疗中获益。 方法。使用随机效应模型,基于文献对通过对数转换汇总风险比 (HR) 所测量的 PFS 转归进行meta分析。获得了吸烟状态、年龄、性别、种族、EGFR 突变类型和 EGFR TKI 的汇总 HR。通过meta回归分析比较汇总的 HR。 结果。从 7 项前瞻性随机试验(WJTOG3405、NEJ002、EURTAC、OPTIMAL、LUX Lung-3、LUX Lung-6 和 ENSURE)分析的 1 649 名 EGFRm NSCLC 患者当中,83.7% 患者是亚裔,并且 30.0% 患者是过去吸烟者。相等百分数的过去吸烟者接受双药化疗 (30.2%) 或 EGFR TKI (30.0%)。对于从不吸烟者,PFS 的汇总 HR 是 0.29 [95% 置信区间( CI):0.21–0.39],而对于过去吸烟者,是 0.54(95% CI:0.38-0.76)(通过meta回归分析,p < 0.007)。对于外显子 19 缺失,PFS 的汇总 HR 是 0.25(95% CI:0.19-0.31),而对于外显子 21 置换,是 0.44(95% CI:0.34-0.57)(通过meta回归分析,p < 0.001)。对于亚裔,PFS 的汇总 HR 是 0.33(95% CI:0.24-0.46),而对于非亚裔是 0.48 (95% CI:0.28-0.84)(通过meta回归分析,p = 0.261)。 结论。EGFRm NSCLC 患者无论吸烟状态如何,从一线 TKI 治疗的 PFS 获益优于铂类双药化疗;然而,meta 回归分析显示,PFS 获益在从不吸烟者中明显更好。The Oncologist 2015; 20:307–315[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]