These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of fusion rates between rod-based laminar claw hook and posterior cervical screw constructs in Type II odontoid fractures.
    Author: Maciejczak A, Wolan-Nieroda A, Jabłońska-Sudoł K.
    Journal: Injury; 2015 Jul; 46(7):1304-10. PubMed ID: 25687133.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: This study was aimed (i) to compare the fusion rates of rod-based laminar claw hook constructs to that of posterior C1/C2 screw constructs in odontoid fractures, and (ii) to evaluate any complications associated with claw hook/rod constructs. To our knowledge, no study in contemporary literature has presented the effects of using modern rod-based laminar claw hooks for treating odontoid fractures. Unlike laminar clamps from the 1980s, contemporary laminar hook-rod instrumentation systems provide better immobilisation of the cervical spine and allows for building reliable frame-like constructs similar to cervical screw-rod systems. METHODS: A retrospective review of a series of 167 consecutive odontoid fractures from a single-institution was conducted. 30 cases from the series were treated using posterior atlantoaxial fusion, 12 using C1/C2 posterior screws (control group), and 18 with rod-based laminar claw hooks (study group). Hooks were mounted bilaterally in a claw manner on each individual lamina and were rigidly fixed to perpendicular rods with a transverse connector whenever feasible. The minimum follow-up period was one year. Bony union was determined using computed tomography (CT) scan, while stability at the fusion site was assessed using dynamic radiograms. RESULTS: The study group had an overall fusion rate of 89% (non-geriatric 93% while geriatric subgroup 75%) with a 100% stability rate at the fusion site in all cases. In the control group fusion rate was 100%. There were no major complications in both control and study groups. Four minor complications, three in the control and one in the study group, were noted in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results of this study suggest that laminar claw hook-rod systems are useful alternatives to posterior screw techniques. Moreover, the fusion rate in non-geriatric patients is comparable to that of posterior screws. Importantly, they are devoid of the disadvantages and complications posed by screw constructs. Further studies are necessary to confirm these promising results.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]