These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: The enantiomers of the dopamine agonist N-0437: in vivo and in vitro effects on the release of striatal dopamine.
    Author: Timmerman W, Dubocovich ML, Westerink BH, De Vries JB, Tepper PG, Horn AS.
    Journal: Eur J Pharmacol; 1989 Jul 04; 166(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2572424.
    Abstract:
    The enantiomers of the potent and selective dopamine (DA) D-2 receptor agonist 2-(N-propyl-N-2-thienylethyl-amino)-5-hydroxytetralin, N-0437, were tested for their pharmacological actions on DA D-2 autoreceptors in vivo, by measuring DA release by microdialysis during local administration of both drugs and in vitro, by measuring their effects on the electrically stimulated release of [3H]DA from striatal slices. In both experimental situations (-)-N-0437, at low doses, acted as an agonist on receptors controlling DA release. However, in vivo at a concentration of 10 microM (-)-N-0437 induced a short-lasting increase in DA release and in vitro the inhibitory effect of (-)-N-0437 was significantly less pronounced at higher concentrations (1-10 microM). (+)-N-0437 (0.1-10 microM) showed an antagonistic action both in vivo and in vitro. Following inhibition of the neuronal impulse flow with tetrodotoxin, (+)-N-0437 failed to increase DA release suggesting the effect of this enantiomer is not associated with an amphetamine-like action on the nerve terminal. The use of the DA re-uptake inhibitor GBR 12909 confirmed the antagonism of (+)-N-0437 towards DA receptors. Since it is known that (+)-N-0437 acts as an agonist on DA D-2 autoreceptors controlling the synthesis of DA, these results provide additional evidence for the existence of distinct DA D-2 autoreceptor populations involved in the release and synthesis of DA. The differential actions of (-)- and (+)-N-0437 gave rise to mutual antagonism of the actions of the enantiomers both in vivo and in vitro, thus providing a strong argument for using the enantiomers instead of the racemate in clinical situations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]