These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy.
    Author: Wolf M, Schumacher P, Jäger F, Wego J, Fritz U, Korbmacher-Steiner H, Jäger A, Schauseil M.
    Journal: J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 25744094.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Permanent retention is currently the method of choice to stabilize orthodontic treatment results. Frequently, permanent retention schemes are adopted to prevent posttreatment changes in the esthetic zone of the anterior teeth. With increasingly prolonged times of intraoral device use, and retention to be provided in the maxilla despite limited space, the demands placed on well-planned and precise retainer positioning are becoming more exacting. The aim of the present study was to analyze the intraoral precision of lingual retainers made using computer-aided design and machining (CAD/CAM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A custom manufacturer (Retaintechnology; Cologne, Germany) employing innovative CAD/CAM technology was commissioned to fabricate 16 lingual retainers. Following intraoral insertion using the manufacturer's recommended transfer system, impressions of the intraoral situations were taken and scanned for digitization. On this basis, the intraoral retainer positions were compared to the preceding virtual setups by superimposition with the manufacturer's datasets. Three-dimensional processing software (Geomagic Qualify 2012; Geomagic) was used to analyze the retainers, based on a total of 80 interproximal sites, for deviations from their planned positions along the horizontal (x-), sagittal (y-), and vertical (z-) axes. These deviations of the achieved from the intended positions were considered clinically relevant if ≥ 0.5 mm and, based on this premise, were subjected to a t-test with statistical software (Prism; GraphPad). RESULTS: The intraoral retainer positions were found to correlate closely with the preceding virtual setups (i.e., the positions as they had been planned by the custom manufacturer). Positional deviations were significantly less than 0.5 mm. They were very small in the horizontal and sagittal planes and moderately larger in the vertical plane. CONCLUSION: Highly precise intraoral results may be achieved by transferring three-dimensional virtual setups for lingual retainers to the actual patients. This CAD/CAM strategy of making retainers can offer high predictability even in anatomically demanding regions and in the presence of limited space.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]