These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pulmonary blood volume measured by contrast enhanced ultrasound: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
    Author: Herold IH, Soliman Hamad MA, van Assen HC, Bouwman RA, Korsten HH, Mischi M.
    Journal: Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jul; 115(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25753598.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Blood volume quantification is essential for haemodynamic evaluation guiding fluid management in anaesthesia and intensive care practice. Ultrasound contrast agent (UCA)-dilution measured by contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can provide the UCA mean transit time (MTT) between the right and left heart, enabling the assessment of the intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV(UCA)). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the agreement between UCA-dilution using CEUS and transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In an in vitro setup, with variable flows and volumes, we injected a double indicator, ice-cold saline with SonoVue(®), and performed volume measurements using transesophageal echo and thermodilution by PiCCO(®). In a pilot study, we assigned 17 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery for pulmonary blood volume (PBV) measurement using TPTD by PiCCO(®) and ITBV by UCA-dilution. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were performed for all volume measurements. RESULTS: In vitro, 73 experimental MTT's were obtained using PiCCO(®) and UCA-dilution. The volumes by PiCCO(®) and UCA-dilution correlated with true volumes; r(s)=0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97; P<0.0001) and r(s)=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98; P<0.0001), respectively. The bias of PBV by PiCCO(®) and ITBV(UCA) were -380 ml and -42 ml, respectively. In 16 patients, 86 measurements were performed. The correlation between PBV by PiCCO(®) and ITBV(UCA) was r(s)=0.69 (95% CI 0.55-0.79; P<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of -323 ml. CONCLUSIONS: ITBV assessment with CEUS seems a promising technique for blood volume measurement, which is minimally-invasive and bedside applicable. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN90330260.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]