These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Renal safety of coformulated tenofovir/emtricitabine vs other nucleoside analogues in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients aged 50 years or older in Spain: The TRIP study.
    Author: Pedrol E, Caro-Murillo AM, Castaño MA, Riera M, Olalla J, Domingo P, Arazo P, Gómez-Sirvent JL, Pulido F, Romero-Palacios A, Aguirrebengoa K, Vera F, Ferrer P, Blanco Ramos JR.
    Journal: HIV Clin Trials; 2015; 16(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 25777189.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to describe the impact of emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir (TDF) versus other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs)-based regimens on renal function of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) naïve patients >50 years old who started combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). DESIGN: National, retrospective cohort analysis of patients >50 years old when they started cART (January 1, 2006-December 31, 2009). METHODS: We compared renal safety (changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] during the first year, and time to renal events during 4 years of follow-up) in FTC/TDF versus non-FTC/TDF users. Among FTC/TDF users, we compared protease inhibitors vs non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and Lopinavir/ritonavir vs Efavirenz. RESULTS: We included 103 patients: median age: 54.9 years, 84% males, median CD4 count 247 cells/μl, median viral load 4.7 log; median follow up 18 months (max: 48 months); 73 started with FTC/TDF and 30 with other NRTIs. Change in eGFR was significantly worse for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) vs efavirenz (EFV) users in the FTC/TDF group (71.2 vs 98.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at month 12, P < 0.05). The risk of renal events (progression to an Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration value < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in subjects with baseline values >60) was comparable for FTC/TDF users and non users, but was higher and almost significant for LPV/r as compared to EFV users in the FTC/TDF group (adjusted hazard ratio 6.1, 95% CI 0.8-45.5). CONCLUSIONS: In our study with a population of HIV infected subjects ≥ 50 years old, renal safety was similar for FTC/TDF and other NRTI-based regimens, but worse for LPV/r as compared to other regimens.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]