These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Spinal cord stimulation protects against ventricular arrhythmias by suppressing left stellate ganglion neural activity in an acute myocardial infarction canine model.
    Author: Wang S, Zhou X, Huang B, Wang Z, Liao K, Saren G, Lu Z, Chen M, Yu L, Jiang H.
    Journal: Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1628-35. PubMed ID: 25778432.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may reduce ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) induced by acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Furthermore, activation of left stellate ganglion (LSG) appears to facilitate VAs after AMI. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether pretreatment with SCS could protect against VAs by reducing LSG neural activity in an AMI canine model. METHODS: Thirty dogs were anesthetized and randomly divided into SCS group (with SCS, n = 15) and sham group (sham operation without SCS, n = 15). SCS was performed for 1 hour before AMI. Heart rate variability (HRV), ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), serum norepinephrine level, LSG function measured by blood pressure increases in response to LSG stimulation, and LSG neural activity were measured for 1 minute at baseline and 1 hour after SCS. AMI was induced by left anterior descending coronary artery ligation, and then HRV, LSG neural activity, and VAs were measured. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, SCS for 1 hour significantly prolonged ventricular ERP, increased HRV, and attenuated LSG function and LSG activity in the SCS group, whereas no significant change was shown in the sham group. AMI resulted in a significant decrease in HRV and increase in LSG neural activity in the sham group, which were attenuated in the SCS group (frequency: 99 ± 34 impulses/min vs 62 ± 22 impulses/min; amplitude: 0.41 ± 0.12 mV vs 0.18 ± 0.05 mV; both P <.05). The incidence of VAs was significantly lower in the SCS group than in the sham group. CONCLUSION: SCS may prevent AMI-induced VAs, possibly by suppressing LSG activity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]