These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The incidence of "load&go" out-of-hospital cardiac arrest candidates for emergency department utilization of emergency extracorporeal life support: A one-year review.
    Author: Poppe M, Weiser C, Holzer M, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, Keferböck M, Zeiner S, Lobmeyr E, van Tulder R, Ziegler A, Glück H, Meixner M, Schrattenbacher G, Maszar H, Zajicek A, Sterz F, Schober A.
    Journal: Resuscitation; 2015 Jun; 91():131-6. PubMed ID: 25779007.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is poor and gets worse after prolonged resuscitation. Recently introduced attempts like an early installed emergency extracorporeal life support (E-ECLS) in patients with persisting cardiac arrest at the emergency department (ED) are tried. The "Vienna Cardiac Arrest Registry" (VICAR) was introduced August 2013 to collect Utstein-style data. The aim of this observational study was to identify the incidence of patients which fulfil "load&go"-criteria for E-ECLS at the ED. METHODS: VICAR was retrospectively analyzed for following criteria: age <75 years; witnessed OHCA; basic life support; ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia; no return-of-spontaneous-circulation (ROSC) within 15 min of advanced-life-support, which were supposed as potential optimal criteria for "load&go" plus successful E-ECLS treatment at the ED. The observation period was from August 1, 2013 to July 31, 2014. RESULTS: Over 948 OHCA patients registered during the study period; data were exploitable for 864 patients. Of all patients, "load&go"-criteria were fulfilled by 55 (6%). However, 96 (11%) were transported with on-going CPR to the ED. Of these 96 patients, only 16 (17%) met the "load&go"-criteria. Similarly, among the 96 patients, 12 adults were treated with E-ECLS at the ED, with only 5 meeting the criteria. Among these 12 patients, favourable neurological outcome (CPC 1/2) was obtained in 1 patient without criteria. CONCLUSION: Further promotion of these criteria within the ambulance crews is needed. May be these criteria could serve as a decision support for emergency physicians/paramedics, which patients to transport with on-going CPR to the ED for E-ECLS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]