These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis: can pretreatment with 125I-labeled receptor prevent functional damage at the neuromuscular junction? Author: Sterz RK, Biro G, Rajki K, Filipp G, Peper K. Journal: J Immunol; 1985 Feb; 134(2):841-6. PubMed ID: 2578165. Abstract: Rats were immunized with purified receptor from electric fish to induce experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis (EAMG). It is implied by the clonal selection theory that antigens react only with receptors on specific immunocompetent cell subpopulations. In an attempt to damage these specific cells with the aid of highly radioactive antigen, one group of rats was pretreated with an additional injection of radiolabeled receptor of high specific activity 3 days before the basic immunization. The success of the immunization was monitored by measuring changes in the following three parameters: antibody titers against nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; number of alpha-bungarotoxin-binding sites at endplates; and number of acetylcholine-operated ionic endplate channels, using quantitative electrophysiologic methods. Conventionally immunized animals showed the classical signs of EAMG: elevated antibody titers against nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and a reduction of the number of alpha-bungarotoxin-binding sites, as well as reduction of the number of acetylcholine-operated ionic channels. The same symptoms were found in animals pretreated with unlabeled receptor and in animals pretreated with radioactive albumin. Animals pretreated with radioactively labeled receptor showed far less reduction of functional nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and only slightly raised antibody titers. This study suggests that preimmunization with radioactive antigen selectively eliminates immunocompetent cells, thus precluding the production of antibodies by a subsequent immunization procedure. The same protective effect cannot be obtained by either preimmunization with unlabeled antigen or by radioactively labeled unspecific antigen.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]