These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Two-group comparisons of zero-inflated intensity values: the choice of test statistic matters.
    Author: Gleiss A, Dakna M, Mischak H, Heinze G.
    Journal: Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul 15; 31(14):2310-7. PubMed ID: 25788623.
    Abstract:
    MOTIVATION: A special characteristic of data from molecular biology is the frequent occurrence of zero intensity values which can arise either by true absence of a compound or by a signal that is below a technical limit of detection. RESULTS: While so-called two-part tests compare mixture distributions between groups, one-part tests treat the zero-inflated distributions as left-censored. The left-inflated mixture model combines these two approaches. Both types of distributional assumptions and combinations of both are considered in a simulation study to compare power and estimation of log fold change. We discuss issues of application using an example from peptidomics.The considered tests generally perform best in scenarios satisfying their respective distributional assumptions. In the absence of distributional assumptions, the two-part Wilcoxon test or the empirical likelihood ratio test is recommended. Assuming a log-normal subdistribution the left-inflated mixture model provides estimates for the proportions of the two considered types of zero intensities. AVAILABILITY: R code is available at http://cemsiis.meduniwien.ac.at/en/kb/science-research/software/
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]