MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of cervical cancer and benign cervical lesions at 3.0T: Comparison with routine MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Author: Kuang F, Yan Z, Li H, Feng H.
Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1094-9. PubMed ID: 25824638.
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T1 WI and T2 WI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), and DCE-MRI (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI) at 3.0T for differentiation of cervical cancer and benign cervical lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 75 cervical cancer patients, 26 cervical leiomyoma patients, 22 patients with cervical polyps consecutively underwent pelvic MRI scanning on a 3T MR unit. Two radiologists independently evaluated images at three imaging settings; routine MRI alone, DWI combined with routine MRI (DWI+routine MRI), and DCE-MRI. The apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were calculated from b 0, 600 s/mm(2) and b 0, 1000 s/mm(2). RESULTS: DWI+routine MRI was significantly better than routine MRI and obtained high accuracy (0.95); the diagnostic performance was not significantly different between DWI+routine MRI and DCE-MRI. Reader agreement was excellent for both DWI+routine MRI (κ, 0.90) and DCE-MRI (κ, 0.92). The ADCs of cervical cancer were significantly lower than those of benign cervical lesions at both ADC maps (P = 0.0001). The diagnostic accuracy was not different at both ADC maps (P = 0.375). CONCLUSION: For differentiation of cervical cancer and benign cervical lesions, unenhanced MRI with combined diffusion-weighted and routine MRI (DWI+routine MRI) at 3T can provide accurate information and may be preferable to DCE.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]