These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A unifying model for adsorption and nucleation of vapors on solid surfaces.
    Author: Laaksonen A.
    Journal: J Phys Chem A; 2015 Apr 23; 119(16):3736-45. PubMed ID: 25831213.
    Abstract:
    Vapor interaction with solid surfaces is traditionally described with adsorption isotherms in the undersaturated regime and with heterogeneous nucleation theory in the supersaturated regime. A class of adsorption isotherms is based on the idea of vapor molecule clustering around so-called active sites. However, as the isotherms do not account for the surface curvature effects of the clusters, they predict an infinitely thick adsorption layer at saturation and do not recognize the existence of the supersaturated regime. The classical heterogeneous nucleation theory also builds on the idea of cluster formation, but describes the interactions between the surface and the cluster with a single parameter, the contact angle, which provides limited information compared with adsorption isotherms. Here, a new model of vapor adsorption on nonporous solid surfaces is derived. The basic assumption is that adsorption proceeds via formation of molecular clusters, modeled as liquid caps. The equilibrium of the individual clusters with the vapor phase is described with the Frenkel-Halsey-Hill (FHH) adsorption theory modified with the Kelvin equation that corrects for the curvature effect on vapor pressure. The new model extends the FHH adsorption isotherm to be applicable both at submonolayer surface coverages and at supersaturated conditions. It shows good agreement with experimental adsorption data from 12 different adsorbent-adsorbate systems. The model predictions are also compared against heterogeneous nucleation data, and they show much better agreement than predictions of the classical heterogeneous nucleation theory.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]