These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Can (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan change treatment planning and be prognostic in recurrent colorectal carcinoma? A prospective and follow-up study.
    Author: Artiko V, Odalovic S, Sobic-Saranovic D, Petrovic M, Stojiljkovic M, Petrovic N, Kozarevic N, Grozdic-Milojevic I, Obradovic V.
    Journal: Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 25840571.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To prospectively study whether in patients with resected primary colorectal cancer fluorine- 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) examination could diagnose the stage, specify treatment procedure and be prognostic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 75 patients with resected primary colorectal adenocarcinoma referred for (18)F-FDG PET/CT to the National PET Center, at the Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, from January 2010 to May 2013. Findings of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were compared to findings of subsequent histopathological examinations or with results of clinical and imaging follow-up. Patients were followed after PET/CT examination for a mean follow-up time of 16.7±5.9 months. RESULTS: In the detection of recurrent disease (18)F-FDG PET/CT showed overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 96.6%, 82.4%, 94.9%, 87.5% and 93.3%, respectively. In the detection of stages I and II sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were: 88%, 96.6% and 94.7%, respectively, and in the detection of stages III and IV sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 94.9%, 87.5% and 93.3%, respectively. These findings prevented or changed intended surgical treatment in 12/32 cases. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses revealed that metastatic recurrence (stages III and IV) was the only and independent prognostic factor of disease progression during follow-up (P=0.012 and P=0.023, respectively). Although, survival seemed better in patients with local recurrence compared to metastatic recurrent disease, this difference did not reach significance (Log-rank test; P=0.324). In addition, progression-free survival time was significantly longer in patients in whom (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan led to treatment changes (Log-rank test; P=0.037). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT was sensitive and accurate for the detection and staging of local and metastatic recurrent colorectal carcinoma, with higher specificity in the detection of local recurrences. The (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan induced treatment changes in 30/75 patients, including 12/32 patients in which surgical treatment was previously planned, and progression free survival time was significantly longer in these patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]