These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Efficacy of a combined in-office/home-use desensitizing system containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate in reducing dentin hypersensitivity: an 8-week randomized clinical study.
    Author: França IL, Sallum EA, Do Vale HF, Casati MZ, Sallum AW, Stewart B.
    Journal: Am J Dent; 2015 Feb; 28(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 25864242.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity (DHS) of a combined in-office and home-use desensitizing system, each product containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate (Test), following a dental scaling procedure, compared to the combination of a conventional prophylactic paste and a potassium nitrate dentifrice (Control), in a group of patients with known dentin hypersensitivity. METHODS: An 8-week clinical study, with 50 subjects, was conducted in Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, using a double-blind/two treatment design. Air blast sensitivity assessments were used to compare the efficacy of the two approaches using both the Schiff scale as well as a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Immediately after prophylaxis, the Test treatment provided significant reduction in DHS when compared to baseline values (VAS = 26.2% and Schiff = 29.1%), while for Control treatment this difference was not statistically significant (VAS = 8.1% and Schiff = 6.6%). The comparison between groups after prophylaxis showed a greater DHS reduction for the Test treatment (P < 0.05). The reductions in DHS after 2, 4 and 8 weeks were significant for both groups, however, when considering Schiff scale, the Test treatment provided greater DHS reduction after 2 weeks (44.5% for Test versus 27.7% for Control) and 4 weeks (55.2% for Test and 40.5% for Control), while after 8 weeks there was no significant difference between groups (71.1% for Test versus 61.1% for Control).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]