These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Endophthalmitis After Intravitreal Injections: Incidence, Presentation, Management, and Visual Outcome.
    Author: Dossarps D, Bron AM, Koehrer P, Aho-Glélé LS, Creuzot-Garcher C, FRCR net (FRenCh Retina specialists net).
    Journal: Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 160(1):17-25.e1. PubMed ID: 25892127.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To report the incidence and characteristics of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents or corticosteroids and to describe the clinical and bacteriologic characteristics, management, and outcome of these eyes with acute endophthalmitis in France. DESIGN: Retrospective, nationwide multicenter case series. METHODS: From January 2, 2008 to June 30, 2013, a total of 316,576 intravitreal injections from 25 French ophthalmic centers were included. For each center, the number of intravitreal injections was determined using billing codes and the injection protocol was recorded. A registry and hospital records were reviewed to identify patients treated for endophthalmitis after injection during the same time period. The main outcome measures were the incidence of clinical endophthalmitis and visual acuity of endophthalmitis cases. RESULTS: During the study period, 65 cases of presumed endophthalmitis were found, giving an overall incidence of 0.021% (2.1 in 10,000 injections) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.016%-0.026%). The median number of days from injection to presentation was 4 [1-26] days. The most common symptom was vision loss. Bacterial identification was achieved in 43.4%. The most frequent pathogens were gram-positive bacteria (91.3%), including coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 78.3%. Neither the interval between injection and presentation for endophthalmitis nor the clinical signs differentiated culture-positive from culture-negative cases. In multivariate analysis, the use of a disposable conjunctival mould assist device and the use of prophylaxis with an antibiotic or antiseptic were significantly associated with an increased incidence of endophthalmitis (P = .001). The majority of patients had worse visual acuity after 3 months of follow-up when compared with acuity before endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of presumed endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors or corticosteroids was low and the prognosis poor. Prevention and management remain challenging. It remains to be determined whether the findings of this study are relevant for other countries using different techniques for intravitreal injections.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]