These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: New standardized cystatin C and creatinine GFR equations in children validated with inulin clearance.
    Author: Berg UB, Nyman U, Bäck R, Hansson M, Monemi KÅ, Herthelius M, Björk J.
    Journal: Pediatr Nephrol; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1317-26. PubMed ID: 25903639.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: This study compares glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations in children based on standardized cystatin C (CYSC) and creatinine (CREA) and their combinations with renal clearance of inulin (C-inulin). METHODS: A total of 220 children with different renal disorders were referred for C-inulin (median 84 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Bias, precision (interquartile range, IQR), and accuracy (percentage of estimates ±30 % of C-inulin; P30) were evaluated for two cystatin C equations, CAPACYSC and BergCYSC, for creatinine equations, SchwartzCREA and GaoCREA, the arithmetic mean of CAPACYSC and SchwartzCREA (MEANCAPA+Schwartz), BergCYSC and SchwartzCREA (MEANBERG+SCHWARTZ) and the composite equation ChehadeCYSC+CREA. RESULTS: Overall results of CAPACYSC, BergCYSC, SchwartzCREA, GaoCREA, MEANCAPA+Schwartz, MEANBERG+SCHWARTZ and ChehadeCYSC+CREA were: median bias -7.6/-4.9/-3.7/-2.3/-4.6/-4.0/-10.1 %, IQR 20.0/19.9/21.7/22.4/21.0/20.9/23.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and P30 86/86/80/83/89/91/83 %. The cystatin C equations, MEANCAPA+Schwartz and MEANBERG+SCHWARTZ had a more stable performance across subgroups compared with SchwartzCREA, GaoCREA and ChehadeCYSC+CREA. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C was the preferred filtration marker for GFR estimation in children, while the benefit of combining cystatin C and creatinine deserves further investigations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]