These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Automated Tube Potential Selection as a Method of Dose Reduction for CT of the Neck: First Clinical Results. Author: Bodelle B, Beeres M, Scheithauer S, Wichmann JL, Nour-Eldin NE, Vogl TJ, Schulz B. Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1049-54. PubMed ID: 25905940. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate whether the use of a software-based automated tube potential selection (ATPS) CT neck protocol can result in radiation dose reduction as compared with a set 120-kV protocol without a statistically significant reduction in image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-four patients (median age, 52 years) underwent CT of the neck. Group 1 (n = 320) underwent CT with ATPS with 80, 100, or 120 kV. Group 2 (n = 44) was examined with the standard CT protocol at 120 kV. Attenuation, image background noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), dose-length product (DLP), volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), body mass index (BMI [weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters]), and subjective image quality (5-point Likert scale, two readers in consensus) were analyzed. RESULTS: A tube potential of 100 kV was selected in 279 patients, 120 kV in 40 patients, and 80 kV in one patient of the ATPS group. A significant correlation was found for selected tube potential and BMI (80 kV, BMI = 20.4; 100 kV, mean BMI = 24.2; 120 kV, BMI = 28.6; r = 0.28, p < 0.01). The average radiation dose was significantly lower with ATPS activated than with the standard protocol (mean DLP, 259 vs 350 mGy × cm, respectively). Background noise did not differ between groups 1 and 2 at the levels of the mandibular angle and the upper mediastinum; however, attenuation and SNR increased significantly with lower tube potential settings. Subjective image quality did not suffer (mean image quality score: ATPS protocol vs standard protocol, 4.56 vs 4.61, respectively; p > 0.05) with good interobserver agreement (κ > 0.56). CONCLUSION: ATPS allows significant dose savings for CT of the neck compared with a standard protocol that uses a fixed 120-kV setting without a statistically significant reduction in image quality.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]