These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intradural communication between dorsal rootlets of spinal nerves: their clinical significance.
    Author: Solmaz B, Tatarlı N, Ceylan D, Keleş E, Çavdar S.
    Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2015 Jun; 157(6):1069-76; discussion 1076. PubMed ID: 25911298.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Anatomical and surgical textbooks give almost no attention to the intradural communications between dorsal rootlets of adjacent spinal nerves. These communications can be of significance in various neurosurgical procedures and clinical conditions of the region. METHODS: The spinal cord of six formaldehyde-fixed cadavers was dissected from C1-S5. The dorsal rootlets of the spinal nerves were exposed via a posterior approach and communications between adjacent spinal nerves were documented. RESULTS: The frequency of communication between adjacent dorsal rootlets of the spinal nerves showed variations among spinal levels. Thirty-eight dorsal rootlet communications were observed in six cadavers (12 sides) and 20 (52.6%) were at cervical levels, 14 (36.8%) at thoracic levels, and four (10.5%) at lumbar levels. The majority of communications were observed on the left side (65.8%). Communications were most frequently observed at cervical (C4-C5, C5-C6) and upper thoracic (T1-T2) levels and seen least frequently at lower thoracic and lumbar levels. No communications were observed at sacral levels. Five types of communication were observed: I. oblique ascending, II. oblique descending III. short Y, IV. long Y and V shaped. None of the communication extended beyond one segment at any spinal level. The occurrence of such dorsal rootlet communications ranged from 3 to 7 for each cadaver and the mean was 4.8 ± 1.3. Histological sections from various levels of the dorsal rootlet communications showed that all consisted of myelinated fibers of varying diameters. CONCLUSIONS: Such communications may lead to misinterpretation of the pathology on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms and also should be considered in rhizotomy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]