These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Excellent prognosis following endoscopic resection of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors despite the frequent presence of lymphovascular invasion.
    Author: Sekiguchi M, Sekine S, Sakamoto T, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Taniguchi H, Kushima R, Ohe Y, Saito Y.
    Journal: J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 50(12):1184-9. PubMed ID: 25936647.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) has been increasingly used for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); however, only limited data are available on its long-term outcomes. This study analyzed the long-term outcomes of rectal NETs treated by ER and characterized potential risk factors for metastasis in these cases, with emphasis on lymphovascular invasion. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features and outcomes of 86 patients with 90 rectal NETs who had been treated by ER. Lymphovascular invasion was reevaluated using elastic-staining and double-staining immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: En bloc resection with tumor-free margins was achieved in 87 lesions (96.7%). The median tumor size was 5 mm (range 2-13), and all the lesions were confined to the submucosal layer. The Ki-67 index was less than 3% in all the lesions, which were therefore classified as NET G1. Elastic-staining and double-staining immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of lymphatic and venous invasion in 23 (25.6%) and 35 lesions (36.7%), respectively. Collectively, lymphatic and/or vascular invasion was identified in 42 lesions (46.7%). All cases were followed up without additional surgery, and no metastasis or recurrence was detected during the median follow-up period of 67.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed an excellent long-term prognosis following ER of patients with rectal NETs, confirming that ER is a valid treatment option for small rectal NETs. The present study also revealed highly prevalent lymphovascular invasion even in minute rectal NETs; this observation raises a question regarding its significance as a risk factor for metastasis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]