These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Ascites and pleural effusion. Study and follow-up of 79 patients].
    Author: Molina M, Ortega G, Vidal L, Montoya JJ, Pérez A, García B.
    Journal: Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig; 1989 Oct; 76(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 2595069.
    Abstract:
    We reviewed 79 patients with a picture of pleural effusion (EP) and ascites, who represented 8% of a total of 982 pleural effusions studied. Liver cirrhosis (CH), 37 cases (47%), disseminated carcinomatosis, 31 cases (39.5%), and congestive heart failure, 6 cases (7%), were the main causes. We made two groups of liver cirrhosis: A) liver cirrhosis with hydropic decompensation, 12 patients (15%), and B) liver cirrhosis with an additional complication added to the above, 25 patients (31.5%), this being infectious in 88% of the cases. In the B group there were cases of left hydrothorax, more features of effusion and a lower survival at 3 months of follow-up than in tha A group. Effusions of neoplastic origin were most frequently seen in tumors of the ovary, digestive system, lymphomas and undetermined origin. In malignant effusions, the cytology was positive in pleura in 60% and in ascites in 55%. Twenty percent of peritoneal fluids and 47% of pleural effusions were serohemorrhagic and 100% and 88%, respectively, were of exudative nature. In liver cirrhosis the ascites was serofibrinous and transudated (100% in group A and 85.5% in B) and the pleural effusion was a serofibrinous transudate except in the cases in which there was an added infection. We confirm the ominous prognosis of the coexistence of pleural effusion and ascites.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]