These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Relationship of Various Open Quotients With Acoustic Property, Phonation Types, Fundamental Frequency, and Intensity.
    Author: Yokonishi H, Imagawa H, Sakakibara K, Yamauchi A, Nito T, Yamasoba T, Tayama N.
    Journal: J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 25953586.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: In the present study, we examined the relationship between various open quotients (Oqs) and phonation types, fundamental frequency (F0), and intensity by multivariate linear regression analysis (MVA) to determine which Oq best reflects vocal fold vibratory characteristics. METHODS: Using high-speed digital imaging (HSDI), a sustained vowel /e/ at different phonation types, F0s, and intensities was recorded from six vocally healthy male volunteers: the types of phonation included modal, falsetto, modal breathy, and modal pressed phonations; and each phonation was performed at different F0s and intensities. Electroglottography (EGG) and sound signals were simultaneously recorded with HSDI. From the obtained data, 10 conventional Oqs (four Oqs from the glottal area function, four kymographic Oqs, and two EGG-derived Oqs) and two newly introduced Oqs (Oq(edge)+ and Oq(edge)) were evaluated. And, relationships between various Oqs and phonation types, F0, and intensity were evaluated by MVA. RESULTS: Among the various Oqs, Oq(edge)+ and Oq(edge) revealed the strongest correlations with an acoustic property and could best describe changes in phonation types: Oq(edge) was found to be better than Oq(edge)¯. Oq(MLK), the average of five Oqs from five-line multiline kymography was a very good alternative to Oq(edge)¯. EGG-derived Oqs were able to differentiate between modal phonation and falsetto phonation, but it was necessary to consider the change of F0 simultaneously. MVA showed the changes in Oq values between modal and other phonation types, the degree of involvement of intensity, and no relationship between F0 and Oqs. CONCLUSIONS: Among Oqs evaluated in this study, Oq(edge)+ and Oq(edge) were considered to best reflect the vocal fold vibratory characteristics.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]