These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Predictive validity of the post-enrolment English language assessment tool for commencing undergraduate nursing students.
    Author: Glew PJ, Hillege SP, Salamonson Y, Dixon K, Good A, Lombardo L.
    Journal: Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1142-7. PubMed ID: 25956857.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Nursing students with English as an additional language (EAL) may underperform academically. The post-enrolment English language assessment (PELA) is used in literacy support, but its predictive validity in identifying those at risk of underperformance remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To validate a PELA, as a predictor of academic performance. DESIGN: Prospective survey design. SETTING: The study was conducted at a university located in culturally and linguistically diverse areas of western Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Commencing undergraduate nursing students who were Australian-born (n=1323, 49.6%) and born outside of Australia (n=1346, 50.4%) were recruited for this study. The 2669 (67% of 3957) participants provided consent and completed a first year nursing unit that focussed on developing literacy skills. METHOD: Between 2010 and 2013, commencing students completed the PELA and English language acculturation scale (ELAS), a previously validated instrument. The grading levels of the PELA tool were: Level 1 (proficient), Level 2 (borderline), and Level 3 (poor, and requiring additional support). RESULTS: Participants with a PELA Level 2 or 3 were more likely to be: a) non-Australian-born (χ(2): 520.6, df: 2, p<0.001); b) spoke a language other than English at home (χ(2): 490.2, df: 2, p<0.001); and c) an international student (χ(2): 225.6, df: 2, p<0.001). There was an inverse relationship between participants' ELAS scores and PELA levels (r=-0.52, p<0.001), and those graded as 'proficient' with a PELA Level 1 were more likely to obtain higher scores in their: i) unit essay assessment (χ(2): 40.2, df: 2, p<0.001); ii) final unit mark (χ(2): 218.6, df: 2, p<0.001), and attain a higher GPA (χ(2): 100.8, df: 2, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The PELA is a useful screening tool in identifying commencing nursing students who are at risk of academic underachievement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]