These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The efficacy of a lysine-based dendritic hydrogel does not differ from those of commercially available tissue sealants and adhesives: an ex vivo study.
    Author: Villa-Camacho JC, Ghobril C, Anez-Bustillos L, Grinstaff MW, Rodríguez EK, Nazarian A.
    Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 May 13; 16():116. PubMed ID: 25968126.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Hemostatic agents, tissue adhesives and sealants may contribute to a reduction in hemorrhage-associated morbidity and mortality. Towards this end, we have recently developed a lysine-based dendritic hydrogel (PEG-LysNH2) that can potentially be used in the management of severe trauma and/or intraoperative bleeding. As a first step in demonstrating the potential utility of this approach, our objective was to ascertain the ability of the PEG-LysNH2 to adhere to and seal injured tissues, as well as to maintain the seal under physiological conditions. METHODS: The efficacy of the PEG-LysNH2 in sealing injured tissues was evaluated using an ex-vivo pressure testing system. A 2.5 mm incision was made on intact ex-vivo tissues and then sealed with the PEG-LysNH2. Application of the PEG-LysNH2 was followed by 1) step-wise pressure increase to a maximum of 250 mmHg and 2) fluctuating pressures, between 100-180 mmHg with a rate of 3 Hz, over a 24-hour period. The performance of the PEG-LysNH2 was compared to those of commercially available sealants and adhesives. RESULTS: During gradual pressure increase, mean pressures at 30 seconds (P30) ranged between 206.36 - 220.17 mmHg for the sealants, and they were greater than control and suture groups (p < 0.01 and p = 0.013, respectively). Additionally, all products held under fluctuating pressures: mean pressures ranged between 135.20 - 160.09 mmHg, and there were no differences observed between groups (p = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the PEG-LysNH2 was significantly superior to conventional injury repair methods (sutures) and did not differ from those of commercially available products when sealing small incisions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]